‘Dozen terrorists’ killed in airstrikes by Mali forces

TOKYO: The dramatic sinking of Russia’s guided-missile cruiser Moskva – the flagship of its Black Sea Fleet – on Thursday was followed by a US defence official telling reporters that Moscow immediately moved its four to five remaining ships in those waters south, farther from Ukraine. The Moskva was 60 to 65 nautical miles south of the Ukrainian port city of Odessa. The other Russian vessels, which were operating near the flagship, are now no closer than 80 nautical miles from the coast, the American official said. “In the wake of the damage that the Moskva experienced, all the northern Black Sea ships have now moved out, away from the northern areas where they were operating,” the official said. Russia, as of yesterday, had not confirmed that the Moskva was hit by Neptune anti-ship missiles fired by Ukraine, as Kyiv asserts. But the movements of the Russian vessels suggest the threat is real. These rapid developments put the spotlight once again on Turkey, which sits across the Black Sea and controls the maritime passage between those waters and the Mediterranean Sea. Should Russia want to send more ships into the Black Sea to replace the Moskva or withdraw its Black Sea Fleet to the Mediterranean, it must persuade Turkey to open the Bosporus and the Dardanelles. These straits have been closed to warships since late February, after Russia’s invasion of Ukraine. The closure of the two straits, known collectively as the Turkish Straits, is based on the 1936 Convention Regarding the Regime of the Straits – or the Montreux Convention – which lets Turkey block ships of belligerent powers from transiting during war. The only vessels allowed to pass, even during the blockade, are those that have been separated from their home bases and are returning. Hypothetically, if Russia’s remaining four to five ships wanted to withdraw from the Black Sea, only those that came from outside could pass, in the name of returning to their home base. Vessels based in the Black Sea cannot leave the water body. Soner Cagaptay, director of the Turkish Research Program at the Washington Institute for Near East Policy, said the sinking of the Moskva disrupts Russian president Vladimir Putin’s war plans and raises a potential clash with Turkish president Recep Tayyip Erdogan. “If Putin’s plans still include an amphibious attack on Odessa or require a significant naval presence to keep pressure on Ukraine, he will need to bring additional vessels to the Black Sea, and that’s not going to happen,” Cagaptay said. “Turkey would need to violate Montreux, which it would never do, to allow extra naval vessels to come in.” A senior Turkish official told Nikkei Asia that Ankara will not permit the entry or exit of naval vessels as long as the war continues. “The answer is a clear ‘no’,” this official said when asked whether conditions could change if the war were prolonged. Turkish foreign minister Mevlut Cavusoglu told domestic channel NTV on Thursday that the country is still implementing the Montreux Convention in full. Can Kasapoglu, director of the security and defence studies programme at leading Turkish think-tank Center for Economics and Foreign Policy Studies, described how the loss of the Moskva damages Russia’s capabilities. “This will seriously discourage Russia from staging an amphibious assault on Odessa,” he said. “The odds of such a scenario have significantly diminished.” The military expert called the loss a “total humiliation” for Russia. “Moskva, the prestigious naval platform named after the capital, has been taken out by Ukraine, which practically has no naval force,” he said. Russia’s inability to anticipate such Ukrainian capability signals an intelligence failure, Kasapoglu said. On Thursday, Pentagon spokesman John Kirby praised Turkey’s handling of the straits. “The government of Turkey has been very responsible in how they’ve managed their Montreux responsibilities – the entry into and the exit from the Black Sea,” he told CNN. “And we appreciate the transparency with which they’ve been doing that.”


BAMAKO: Mali’s army said Saturday that they had killed “a dozen terrorists” including a French-Tunisian Islamist in airstrikes in the centre of the Sahel nation.

The armed forces carried out two strikes on Thursday “to neutralise a dozen terrorists in the forest of Ganguel” about 10km from the village of Moura, the general staff said in a press release.

“These strikes made it possible to neutralise some cadres of the GSIM,” (the Group to Support Islam and Muslims, the biggest Islamist alliance in the Sahel) it said, “including Samir Al-Burhan, a Franco-Tunisian terrorist cadre.”

The army said they acted on the basis of precise information regarding a “group of terrorists” it said had come “to boost the morale” of GSIM fighters and provide support to them after their “serious setback at Moura”.

Mali’s military-dominated government says it “neutralised” 203 Islamists in Moura at the end of March, but witnesses interviewed by media and Human Rights Watch (HRW) say soldiers actually killed scores of civilians with help from foreign fighters.

No photos or videos to support either the Malian authorities’ or HRW’s account have emerged from Moura since then.

The UN mission in Mali has for days been asking in vain to be allowed to send a team of investigators to the area.

Ruled by a military junta since August 2020, Mali has been in a political crisis since 2012.

The spread of Islamists from the north of the vast, impoverished country has spilled into neighbouring Burkina Faso and Niger and the conflict has become more complicated with the emergence of local militias and criminal gangs.

Thousands of soldiers and civilians have been killed in the conflict, and hundreds of thousands have been forced to flee their homes.